Wednesday, March 22, 2023
Layman Litigation
  • Login
  • Home
  • Mass Tort
  • Intellectual Property
  • Personal Injury
  • Corporate
  • Other
    • Immigration
    • Employment
    • Civil Litigation
    • General Practice
    • Medical Malpractice
    • Social Security Disability
    • Tax
  • Publications
No Result
View All Result
Layman Litigation
  • Home
  • Mass Tort
  • Intellectual Property
  • Personal Injury
  • Corporate
  • Other
    • Immigration
    • Employment
    • Civil Litigation
    • General Practice
    • Medical Malpractice
    • Social Security Disability
    • Tax
  • Publications
No Result
View All Result
Layman Litigation
No Result
View All Result
Whistleblower Protection Act

Whistleblower Protection Act (WPA)

by Harsh Upadhyay
February 15, 2023
in Employment
Reading Time: 6 mins read
A A
0
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Whistleblower Protection Act (WPA)

The Whistleblower Protection Act (WPA) protects Federal employees and applicants for employment who lawfully disclose information they reasonably believe evidences:

  •  a violation of law, rule, or regulation;
  •  gross mismanagement;
  •  a gross waste of funds;
  •  an abuse of authority;
  •  or a substantial and specific danger to public health or safety.

Under the WPA, certain federal employees may not take or fail to take, or threaten to take or fail to take; any personnel action against an employee or applicant for employment because of the employee or applicant’s protected whistleblowing. See 5 U.S.C. § 2302(b)(8).

Whistleblower Protection Enhancement Act (WPEA)

In 2012 Congress passed the WPEA into law to strengthen protections for Federal employees who report fraud, waste, and abuse. The WPEA clarifies the scope of protected disclosures and establishes that the disclosure does not lose protection because:

  • the disclosure made to someone, including a supervisor, who participated in the wrongdoing disclosed;
  • the wrongdoing reported has previously disclosed;
  • of the employee’s motive for reporting the wrongdoing;
  • the disclosure made while the employee was off duty;
  • the disclosure was made during the employee’s normal course of duty; if the employee can show that the personnel action was taken in reprisal for the disclosure; or
  • the amount of time which has passed since the occurrence of the events described in the disclosure.
  • The WPEA protects disclosures that an employee reasonably believes are evidence of censorship related to research; analysis, or technical information that causes, or will cause, a gross government waste or gross mismanagement; an abuse of authority, a substantial and specific danger to public health or safety, or any violation of law.  It expands the penalties imposed for violating whistleblower protections and establishes the position of Whistleblower Protection Ombudsman.

Enhancement of Contractor Protection from Reprisal (41 U.S.C. § 4712)

The National Defense Authorization Act of 2013 (NDAA); enacted a pilot program making it illegal for an employee of a Federal contractor, subcontractor, grantee, or subgrantee to be discharged, demoted; or otherwise discriminated against for making a protected whistleblower disclosure. In 2016, Congress amended the program to make those protections permanent.

Whistleblower Ombudsman

Pursuant to the Whistleblower Protection Enhancement Act of 2012; the CPSC established a Whistleblower Ombudsman to educate agency employees about prohibitions on retaliation for whistleblowing, as well as employees’ rights and remedies if subjected to retaliation for making a protected disclosure.

The Ombudsman is prohibited by law from acting as a Whistleblower’s representative, agent, or advocate.[1]

NOTICE RELATED TO NON-DISCLOSURE AGREEMENTS

The Whistleblower Protection Enhancement Act of 2012 prohibits agencies from issuing or enforcing nondisclosure agreements, policies, or forms against current or former employees that do not contain the following statement:

Sp, these provisions are consistent with and do not supersede; conflict with, or otherwise alter the employee obligations, rights, or liabilities created by existing statute or Executive order relating to; firstly classified information; secondly communications to Congress; thirdly the reporting to an Inspector General of a violation of any law, rule, or regulation, or mismanagement, a gross waste of funds, an abuse of authority, or a substantial and specific danger to public health or safety, or (4) any other whistleblower protection.

Hence, the controlling Executive Orders and statutory provisions in the event of any conflict with a non-disclosure policy, form, or agreement include:

  • Firstly, the Whistleblower Protection Act, 5 U.S.C. § 2302(b)(8), as amended (governing disclosures of violations of law, waste, fraud, abuse or public health or safety threats);
  • Secondly, 5 U.S.C. § 7211 (governing disclosures to Congress);
  • 10 U.S.C. § 1034, as amended by the Military Whistleblower Protection Act (governing disclosures to Congress by members of the military);
  • The Intelligence Identities Protection Act of 1982, 50 U.S.C. § 421, et seq., (governing disclosures that could expose confidential government agents);
  • The Subversive Activities Act of 1950, 50 U.S.C. § 783(b);
  • The statutes which protect against disclosures that may compromise the national security, including sections 641, 793, 794, 798, and 952, of title 18, United States Code; and
  • Executive Order No. 13526.[2]

CONCLUSION

Pursuant to the Whistleblower Protection Enhancement Act of 2012, the following statement applies to non-disclosure policies, forms, or agreements of the federal government with current or former employees, including those in effect before the Act’s effective date of December 27, 2012:

“These provisions are consistent with and do not supersede, conflict with, or otherwise alter the employee obligations, rights, or liabilities created by existing statute or Executive Order relating to (1) classified information, (2) communications to Congress, (3) the reporting to an Inspector General of a violation of any law, rule, or regulation, or mismanagement, a gross waste of funds, an abuse of authority, or a substantial and specific danger to public health or safety, or (4) any other whistleblower protection. So, the definitions, requirements, obligations, rights, sanctions, and liabilities created by controlling Executive Orders and statutory provisions are incorporated into this agreement and are controlling.”[3]


[1] https://www.cpsc.gov/About-CPSC/Inspector-General/Whistleblower-Protection-Act-WPA

[2] https://www.ftc.gov/about-ftc/office-inspector-general/whistleblower-protection

[3] https://oig.justice.gov/hotline/whistleblower-protection

Tags: Ethics and complianceFederal employee protectionGovernment whistleblowersProtection for whistleblowersReporting illegal activityWhistleblower lawsWhistleblower Protection ActWhistleblower Protection Act (WPA)Whistleblower retaliationWorkplace misconductWPA
Previous Post

The Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act (COBRA)

Next Post

Types of Debt: Secured, Unsecured, and Revolving Debt

Harsh Upadhyay

Harsh Upadhyay

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  • Trending
  • Comments
  • Latest
Outlining Intellectual property right 

Outlining Intellectual property right 

March 11, 2022
USA CODES ON INFRINGEMENT OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAWS

USA CODES ON INFRINGEMENT OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAWS

December 20, 2022
social-media-law-usa

Stay Compliant with social media Laws in the USA

February 7, 2023
Protecting the Environment: An Overview of US Environmental Laws"

Protecting the Environment: An Overview of US Environmental Laws

February 7, 2023
Why Is India’s New IT Rules 2021 Causing Ruckus Among Social Media Giants?

Why Is India’s New IT Rules 2021 Causing Ruckus Among Social Media Giants?

2
Wage Theft ill effects and what it means to employees?

Wage Theft ill effects and what it means to employees?

1
Outlining Intellectual property right 

Outlining Intellectual property right 

1
USA CODES ON INFRINGEMENT OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAWS

USA CODES ON INFRINGEMENT OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAWS

1

All About International Criminal Law

March 17, 2023

Right To Die

March 16, 2023

MILITARY LAW IN THE USA

March 16, 2023

ALL ABOUT ENVIRONMENT PROTECTION REGULATIONS

March 14, 2023

Recent News

All About International Criminal Law

March 17, 2023

Right To Die

March 16, 2023

Categories

  • April 2022 Magazine
  • Civil Litigation
  • Corporate
  • Employment
  • February 2022 Magazine
  • General Practice
  • Immigration
  • Intellectual Property
  • January 2022 Magazine
  • Layman Litigation
  • Magazine
  • March 2022 Magazine
  • Mass Tort
  • Medical Malpractice
  • Personal Injury
  • Social Security Disability
  • Tax

Quick Links

  • Home
  • Mass Tort
  • Intellectual Property
  • Personal Injury
  • Corporate
  • Other
    • Immigration
    • Employment
    • Civil Litigation
    • General Practice
    • Medical Malpractice
    • Social Security Disability
    • Tax
  • Publications

Layman Litigation

© 2021-2022 Layman Litigation - The House For All Legal Info For the People, By the Law Lovers.
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Mass Tort
  • Intellectual Property
  • Personal Injury
  • Corporate
  • Other
    • Immigration
    • Employment
    • Civil Litigation
    • General Practice
    • Medical Malpractice
    • Social Security Disability
    • Tax
  • Publications

© 2021 Layman Litigation - The House For All Legal Info For the People, By the Lawyers.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In