Wednesday, March 22, 2023
Layman Litigation
  • Login
  • Home
  • Mass Tort
  • Intellectual Property
  • Personal Injury
  • Corporate
  • Other
    • Immigration
    • Employment
    • Civil Litigation
    • General Practice
    • Medical Malpractice
    • Social Security Disability
    • Tax
  • Publications
No Result
View All Result
Layman Litigation
  • Home
  • Mass Tort
  • Intellectual Property
  • Personal Injury
  • Corporate
  • Other
    • Immigration
    • Employment
    • Civil Litigation
    • General Practice
    • Medical Malpractice
    • Social Security Disability
    • Tax
  • Publications
No Result
View All Result
Layman Litigation
No Result
View All Result

What is opioid litigation?

by Harsh Upadhyay
February 24, 2022
in Layman Litigation
Reading Time: 5 mins read
A A
0
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Introduction

Prescription Opioid Drugs Manufacturing, Marketing, Distribution and Sales Practices Litigation

The Opioid Epidemic Ravaging the U.S.

Prescription opioid drugs are estimated to kill upwards of 100 Americans per day — over 36,000 Americans per year. Health services providers pay billions of dollars each year both in payments for unnecessary and harmful prescriptions of the drugs. Themselves and the costs of treating the diseases and injuries they cause. Accidental drug overdose deaths, of which at least two-thirds are opioid overdoses. Also, are the leading cause of death for Americans under the age of 50. The economic burden caused by opioid abuse in the United States is approximately $78.5 billion. In addition including lost productivity and increased social services, health insurance costs, increased criminal justice presence and strain on judicial resources, and substance abuse treatment and rehabilitation.

Opioid manufacturing and distributing companies systematically and repeatedly disregarded the health and safety of their customers and the public. Charged by law to monitor and report dangerous behavior. They failed to do so in favor of maximizing corporate profits and increasing their market share. Corporate greed and callous indifference to known, serious potential for human suffering have caused this public health crisis. Defendants helped unleash a healthcare crisis that has had far-reaching financial, social, and deadly consequences in this country[1].

San Francisco Lawsuit

On December 18, 2018, the City Attorney of San Francisco, Dennis Herrera. Related to Lieff Cabraser and co-counsel, recorded a government legal claim. For the benefit of the City and County of San Francisco against the significant drug organizations and merchants answerable for the assembling. transmission, and offer of perilous, profoundly habit-forming and frequently deadly remedy narcotics like Oxycontin and fentanyl in San Francisco. The claim charges these organizations arranged a far reaching misrepresentation wherein they made billions by misleadingly showcasing these medications. To individuals of San Francisco while addressing the medications as protected and successful, making tons of addicts. Therefore, peruse a duplicate of the San Francisco narcotics grievance.

Alaska Tribes & Native Communities Lawsuits

On November 16, 2018, Lieff Cabraser, along with co-counsel, filed a class-action federal RICO lawsuit in Anchorage. Alaska against opioid drug manufacturers and distributors for unnecessary Alaskan Native and American Indian opioid deaths across Alaska. The suit, filed on behalf of the Kenaitze Indian Tribe, the Asa’Carsarmiut Tribe. The Akiak Native Community, the Native Village of Port Heiden, and the Native Village of Afognak, seeks justice for the unprecedented costs. Also depradations of the opioid drug epidemic across Alaska.

Earlier, on October 30, 2018, Lieff Cabraser and co-counsel filed a similar class action RICO lawsuit in Anchorage on behalf of the Tanana Chiefs Conference, Chugachmiut, the Copper River Native Association, the Yukon-Kuskokwim Health Corporation, and Southcentral Foundation against the same group of opiate drug manufacturers and distributorsfor their actions leading to the explosive opioid epidemic across the United States and in the impacted Alaska Native communities. The complaint in the Tanana, et al. suit was amended on November 15, 2018[2].

Current update

States, cities, and counties will soon be receiving funds from opioid manufacturers. Pharmaceutical distributors and pharmacies as a result of litigation brought against these companies for their role in the opioid epidemic that has claimed more than half a million lives over the past two decades.

Governors, attorneys general, and legislators will face difficult decisions in determining the best use of the funds. The following organizations encourage the use of five guiding principles during this process.

Conclusion

Opioid litigation continues a growing public health litigation trend in which governments seek to hold companies responsible for population harms related to their products. The litigation can serve to address gaps in regulatory and legislative policymaking and in market self-regulation pervasive in the prescription opioid domain. Moreover, prior opioid settlements have satisfied civil tort litigation objectives of obtaining compensation for injured parties, deterring harmful behavior, and holding certain opioid manufacturers, distributors and pharmacies accountable for their actions. In this way, opioid litigation represents progress over prior public health litigation campaigns involving tobacco, lead paint, and asbestos, which had more limited tort litigation effects. Although opioid litigation is not a comprehensive solution to the opioid crisis, it can complement other strategies and infuse much needed money, behavior changes, and public accountability for prescription opioid and related harms.


[1] https://www.reuters.com/legal/litigation/drug-distributors-jj-reach-landmark-26-bln-opioid-settlement-2021-07-21/

[2] https://www.lieffcabraser.com/injury/opioids/

Tags: opioid litigation
Previous Post

How to become a general practitioner (lawyer)

Next Post

Can I enter into a contract or not?

Harsh Upadhyay

Harsh Upadhyay

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  • Trending
  • Comments
  • Latest
Outlining Intellectual property right 

Outlining Intellectual property right 

March 11, 2022
USA CODES ON INFRINGEMENT OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAWS

USA CODES ON INFRINGEMENT OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAWS

December 20, 2022
social-media-law-usa

Stay Compliant with social media Laws in the USA

February 7, 2023
Protecting the Environment: An Overview of US Environmental Laws"

Protecting the Environment: An Overview of US Environmental Laws

February 7, 2023
Why Is India’s New IT Rules 2021 Causing Ruckus Among Social Media Giants?

Why Is India’s New IT Rules 2021 Causing Ruckus Among Social Media Giants?

2
Wage Theft ill effects and what it means to employees?

Wage Theft ill effects and what it means to employees?

1
Outlining Intellectual property right 

Outlining Intellectual property right 

1
USA CODES ON INFRINGEMENT OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAWS

USA CODES ON INFRINGEMENT OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAWS

1

All About International Criminal Law

March 17, 2023

Right To Die

March 16, 2023

MILITARY LAW IN THE USA

March 16, 2023

ALL ABOUT ENVIRONMENT PROTECTION REGULATIONS

March 14, 2023

Recent News

All About International Criminal Law

March 17, 2023

Right To Die

March 16, 2023

Categories

  • April 2022 Magazine
  • Civil Litigation
  • Corporate
  • Employment
  • February 2022 Magazine
  • General Practice
  • Immigration
  • Intellectual Property
  • January 2022 Magazine
  • Layman Litigation
  • Magazine
  • March 2022 Magazine
  • Mass Tort
  • Medical Malpractice
  • Personal Injury
  • Social Security Disability
  • Tax

Quick Links

  • Home
  • Mass Tort
  • Intellectual Property
  • Personal Injury
  • Corporate
  • Other
    • Immigration
    • Employment
    • Civil Litigation
    • General Practice
    • Medical Malpractice
    • Social Security Disability
    • Tax
  • Publications

Layman Litigation

© 2021-2022 Layman Litigation - The House For All Legal Info For the People, By the Law Lovers.
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Mass Tort
  • Intellectual Property
  • Personal Injury
  • Corporate
  • Other
    • Immigration
    • Employment
    • Civil Litigation
    • General Practice
    • Medical Malpractice
    • Social Security Disability
    • Tax
  • Publications

© 2021 Layman Litigation - The House For All Legal Info For the People, By the Lawyers.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In