Friday, May 16, 2025
Layman Litigation
  • Login
  • Home
  • Mass Tort
  • Intellectual Property
  • Personal Injury
  • Corporate
  • Other
    • Immigration
    • Employment
    • Civil Litigation
    • General Practice
    • Medical Malpractice
    • Social Security Disability
    • Tax
  • Publications
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
Layman Litigation
  • Home
  • Mass Tort
  • Intellectual Property
  • Personal Injury
  • Corporate
  • Other
    • Immigration
    • Employment
    • Civil Litigation
    • General Practice
    • Medical Malpractice
    • Social Security Disability
    • Tax
  • Publications
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
Layman Litigation
No Result
View All Result
Home Mass Tort

Case Analysis on Master Tort

by Syeda Fauzia
March 5, 2022
in Mass Tort
Reading Time: 6 mins read
A A
0
Case Analysis on Master Tort

Case Analysis on Master Tort

Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Case Analysis on Master Tort

What is a Tort?

A tort is a civil wrong. A civil wrong is nothing but violation of a person’s rights. The law of tort signifies a contravention of greater varieties of rights and duties. It is based on common law of England, which is unwritten and uncodified. The law of tort is also an ever-growing law, and the courts are expanding its horizon continuously by recognizing new torts.[1]

What is Master Tort?

Generally, a man is held liable and is punished accordingly for an unlawful act committed by him. However, there are certain instances where a person is held liable for a crime committed by another. The same is based according to an old doctrine, which is based on the legal maxim “Qui Facit Par Alium Facit Per Se” which means that “a person who does an act through another is deemed in law to do it himself”. A master is liable for the torts of his servant on the basis of this doctrine. A person who gets his work done through another is liable for all the consequences from that act. The master is liable for all such acts of his servant which he does in the course of his employment, as the master is capable of meeting the liability. Another legal maxim “Respondent Superior” means that the superior must be liable for all such acts of his servants which he does in the course of employment, as the master is capable of meeting the liability. [2]

The master tort rule makes an employer (master) be held responsible or vicariously liable for the actions of his employee (servant). The word “vicarious liability” means delegated. Thus, the phrase “vicarious liability,” means the liability of a person for the tort of another.[3] However, determining whether an employer is found liable for an employee’s actions depends largely on whether the employee’s wrongdoing was part of doing the job for the employer or whether the employee was acting out of their own personal interests.[4]

Illustration: “A”, is a driver who works for “B” and while driving B’s car for taking him to his office, he hits “C”, a pedestrian due to his negligence in driving. In such a case even though B was not driving the car he will still be liable for the accident which was caused due to the negligence of A.

Case Laws:

  1. In the case of Gregory v. Piper (1829) 9 B & C 591, the defendant and plaintiff had some disputes between them and the defendant, therefore, ordered his servant to place rubbish across a pathway to prevent the plaintiff from proceeding on that way and the servant took all care to ensure that no part of it was touching the part of the plaintiff’s property but with the passage of some time. The rubbish slid down and touched the walls of the plaintiff and thus he sued for trespass. The defendant was held liable despite his servant taking all due care.[5]
  2. In the case of Wright v. Wilcox, a small boy attempted to climb on an ice wagon driven by the defendant’s servant. The servant, seeing the boy’s attempt, whipped the horses into a trot, causing the boy to be thrown off under a wheel. The US Supreme Court ruled that the master was not responsible since the servant had apparently acted by design. It further held that, “the dividing line is the willfulness of the act and that to be responsible “it must be proved that he [the master] actually assented, for the law will not imply assent.” Thus, only where express authority to commit the willful act existed-an express order to injure could the master be held liable.[6]
  3. In the case of Callaghan v. Harvey, an innkeeper was held responsible for the unwarranted and unauthorized act of a menial servant who had a guest arrested for allegedly cutting a towel off of a hook. The court rested liability on the innkeeper’s duty to provide safe premises for his guests and said that the employer must be responsible for the wrongful act of his servant in violating the duty the hotel owed to the guest.[7]
  4. In another US Supreme Court case held in Ashcroft vs. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662 (2009), that government officials could not be held liable for the unconstitutional conduct of their subordinates under a theory of Respondent Superior.[8]

 

Each tort cases are unique in nature. Tort lawyers usually come into picture when somebody’s right are being infringed. They help in providing compensation or damages that is in monetary form to the victims so suffered and assist them through the taxing legal procedures. They have a critical role in the complex legal system and serve as a backbone in improving the justice system.

Attorneys evaluate each individual case and get familiar with the ever-growing law. They further act as an activist for their clients in and out of courtrooms and make tactical choices on behalf of their clients and for the best outcome possible in a case. They make right out of a wrong.

 

[1] LAW OF TORTS WITH CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT AND MOTOR VEHICLES ACT, DR. J. N. PANDEY, CENTRAL LAW PUBLICATIONS, 9th Edition, 2014, Allahabad.

[2] Ibid.

[3] Ibid 1.

[4] https://www.investopedia.com/terms/m/master-servant-rule.asp

[5] https://blog.ipleaders.in/vicarious-liability-case-master-servant-relationship-tort-law/

[6] https://scholarship.kentlaw.iit.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2059&context=cklawreview&httpsredir=1&referer=

[7] Ibid.

[8] Wikipedia.
Tags: English lawLiabilityMaster TortMaster tort lawyerTort lawUS Supreme Court
Previous Post

PRO’s and CONs of a General Practitioner Lawyer

Next Post

The Dream Act: Let the dreamer’s dream

Syeda Fauzia

Syeda Fauzia

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  • Trending
  • Comments
  • Latest
USA CODES ON INFRINGEMENT OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAWS

USA CODES ON INFRINGEMENT OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAWS

August 22, 2021
Outlining Intellectual property right 

Outlining Intellectual property right 

July 18, 2021
environmental regulations 2025

USA Environmental Regulations 2025 and Sustainability Standards

December 20, 2024
NFTs and intellectual property legal challenges

NFTs and Intellectual Property Legal Challenges Explained

March 14, 2025
All about MASS TORT Cases in United States

All about MASS TORT Cases in United States

2
Wage Theft ill effects and what it means to employees?

Wage Theft ill effects and what it means to employees?

2
Introduction to Air & Space Law: Key Principles & Regulations

Introduction to Air & Space Law: Key Principles & Regulations

2
Medical Negligence Laws in the US

Medical Negligence Laws in the US

1
law day 2025

Law Day 2025: The Evolving Role of Law in a Changing World

April 25, 2025
trademark protection in the age of social media influencers

Trademark Protection in the Age of Social Media Influencers

April 21, 2025
impact of digital nomad visas on immigration law

The Impact of Digital Nomad Visas on Immigration Law 

April 18, 2025
Navigating Sales Tax for E-Commerce

Navigating Sales Tax for E-Commerce in 2025

April 14, 2025

Recent News

law day 2025

Law Day 2025: The Evolving Role of Law in a Changing World

April 25, 2025
trademark protection in the age of social media influencers

Trademark Protection in the Age of Social Media Influencers

April 21, 2025

Categories

  • Business Law
  • Civil Litigation
  • Corporate
  • Cybersecurity Law
  • Election Law
  • Employment
  • Environmental Law
  • General Practice
  • Immigration
  • Intellectual Property
  • Layman Litigation
  • Mass Tort
  • media law
  • Medical Malpractice
  • Personal Injury
  • Political Law
  • Social Security Disability
  • Tax
  • Technology Law
  • Trade law

Quick Links

  • Home
  • About us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy & Policy
  • Other Links

Layman Litigation

© 2025 Layman Litigation - The House For All Legal Info For the People, By the Law Lovers.

Follow us on social media

Copyright © 2025 Do It For Me LLC. For the People, By the Lawyers.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Mass Tort
  • Intellectual Property
  • Personal Injury
  • Corporate
  • Other
    • Immigration
    • Employment
    • Civil Litigation
    • General Practice
    • Medical Malpractice
    • Social Security Disability
    • Tax
  • Publications
  • Contact Us

Copyright © 2025 Do It For Me LLC. For the People, By the Lawyers.